Tag np205

How do I convert a 1984 Ford F350 motorhome from 2WD to 4WD?


Bullnose Bill explaining a 1984 Ford F350 2WD-to-4WD conversion, pointing to axles and transfer cases

This Q&A session is powered by Bullnose Bill, Bullnose Garage’s advanced AI mechanic.
Have your own question? Ask Bill!

Bill says:

Converting a 1984 Ford F350 motorhome from 2WD to 4WD is a big project. Here’s a detailed overview to get you started:

Key Components Needed

  1. Front Axle

    • Dana 60: This is the most common choice for heavy-duty applications like an F350. You’ll need the axle, hubs, and steering components.
  2. Transfer Case

    • NP205: Known for its durability, this gear-driven transfer case is a solid match. Ensure you get the shifter and linkage.
  3. Driveshafts

    • You’ll need a front driveshaft to connect the transfer case to the front axle. The rear driveshaft will also likely need modification.
  4. Crossmember and Mounts

    • A crossmember for the transfer case and mounts for the front axle are necessary. Check for compatibility with your frame.
  5. Suspension

    • Lift springs or a spring-over conversion might be needed to accommodate the front axle and ensure proper clearance.

Steps and Considerations

  1. Planning and Research

    • Gather all necessary parts before starting. This includes brackets, bolts, and any other hardware.
  2. Frame Adjustments

    • Inspect your frame and consider any reinforcements needed for added stress from 4WD components.
  3. Front End Installation

    • Remove the front 2WD components and install the 4WD axle. Ensure alignment and proper fitment.
  4. Transfer Case Installation

    • Modify or replace the transmission tail housing to attach the transfer case. Ensure proper sealing and alignment.
  5. Driveshafts and Linkages

    • Measure for custom driveshafts and ensure the linkages for the transfer case are installed correctly.
  6. Brakes and Steering

    • Upgrade or adjust brake lines for the new setup. Ensure the steering components are compatible with the new axle.
  7. Electrical and Controls

    • Modify speedometer and other controls as necessary. Some wiring may be needed for the 4WD indicator.
  8. Test and Adjust

    • Once installed, thoroughly test the system. Check for leaks, proper engagement, and smooth operation.

Potential Pitfalls

  • Compatibility Issues: Ensure parts are compatible with your specific model and year.
  • Cost and Time: This conversion can be costly and time-consuming.
  • Weight: Consider the added weight and how it affects handling and braking.

Pro Tips

  • Look for a donor truck to source many of these parts.
  • Consider reaching out to the Bullnose Ford subreddit for advice from those who’ve done similar conversions.
  • It might be worth watching any related videos on the Bullnose Garage YouTube channel for visual guidance.

This is a big job, but with careful planning and the right parts, it’s certainly doable. Good luck, and feel free to ask more specific questions as you dive into this project!


User avatar
View Table of Contents
User:

Should I convert my 1984 F350 from automatic to manual for a 4WD swap?

Bill avatar
Bill:

Converting from an automatic to a manual transmission in your 1984 F350 motorhome is a significant undertaking. Here’s what you need to consider:

Pros of Manual Conversion

  1. Control: Manuals offer more control, especially in off-road situations.
  2. Simplicity: Generally simpler to repair and maintain.
  3. Durability: Often more robust for heavy-duty use.

Cons of Manual Conversion

  1. Complexity: The swap requires significant time and effort.
  2. Cost: Can be expensive once you factor in all necessary parts and modifications.
  3. Drivability: Manual transmissions can be less convenient in stop-and-go traffic.

Necessary Components

  1. Transmission: A manual transmission like the T18 or ZF5 would be suitable. Ensure it’s compatible with your engine.

  2. Clutch Assembly: You’ll need a clutch, pressure plate, and flywheel specific to your engine.

  3. Pedal Assembly: A clutch pedal and associated hardware are required.

  4. Bellhousing: Ensure it matches both the engine and the chosen transmission.

  5. Linkage and Cables: You’ll need linkages or hydraulic lines for clutch operation.

  6. Driveshafts: Modifications to the driveshafts may be necessary due to length differences.

  7. Crossmember and Mounts: A different crossmember might be needed for the manual transmission.

Steps and Considerations

  1. Planning: Determine the exact parts needed for your specific setup.
  2. Removing Automatic Components: This includes the transmission, shifter, and associated wiring.
  3. Installing Manual Components: Attach the manual transmission, clutch assembly, and pedals.
  4. Adjustments: Modify driveshafts and potentially the exhaust or other components for clearance.
  5. Electrical Work: Bypass or modify any neutral safety switches and reverse light wiring.

Potential Pitfalls

  • Alignment: Ensuring everything aligns properly is crucial.
  • Fitment Issues: Custom fabrication might be needed for mounts or linkages.
  • Time and Cost: It can be easy to underestimate both.

Pro Tips

  • Source a donor truck to simplify parts gathering.
  • Consider the driving comfort and needs for your particular use case.
  • Engage with communities like the Bullnose Ford subreddit for firsthand insights.

Ultimately, whether to convert depends on your driving needs and mechanical skills. It’s a big project but doable with the right resources. If you have more questions, feel free to ask!

User avatar
View Table of Contents
User:

How does the 460 V8 in my 1984 F350 affect a 2WD-to-4WD conversion?

Bill avatar
Bill:

Great engine choice! The 460 V8 is a powerhouse. Here’s how using the 460 impacts your manual conversion:

Transmission Options for the 460

  1. T18 or T19: Sturdy 4-speed options that can handle the torque of the 460.
  2. ZF5: A 5-speed that offers overdrive for better highway driving.

Key Considerations

  • Bellhousing: Make sure it matches the 460 engine and the transmission.
  • Clutch: A heavy-duty clutch kit is recommended to handle the 460’s power.
  • Flywheel: Ensure the flywheel is compatible with the 460.

Additional Tips

  • Cooling: Consider an upgraded radiator or transmission cooler.
  • Exhaust Clearance: Watch for any interference between the exhaust and manual components.
  • Pedal Assembly: Specific to the 460, ensuring robust linkage for the torque.

Converting to a manual with a 460 is a solid choice for performance and reliability. If you need more detailed guidance, just let me know!

User avatar
View Table of Contents
User:

What donor truck years are best for parts when converting a 1984 F350 to 4WD?

Bill avatar
Bill:

For your 1984 F350 with a 460 engine, here’s a rundown on suitable donor years:

Ideal Donor Trucks

  1. 1980–1986 F-Series: Stick with the Bullnose generation for the best compatibility.

  2. 1973–1979 F-Series: Some components, especially transmissions like the T18, can swap over, but check for specific fitment issues.

  3. 1987–1991 F-Series: Early Bricknose models can provide transmissions like the ZF5, but ensure compatibility with the 460.

Parts to Focus On

  • Transmission and Bellhousing: Ensure the donor has the same engine family.
  • Pedal Assembly: Find one that matches the F350 configuration.
  • Driveshafts: Lengths may vary, but they can be modified.

Pro Tips

  • Verify part numbers and dimensions for compatibility.
  • Check forums or local junkyards for availability and advice.
  • Always inspect donor parts for wear or damage before purchase.

Choosing the right donor truck can make your conversion smoother and more cost-effective. If you have more questions, feel free to ask!

User avatar
View Table of Contents
User:

Can a transfer case from a 1981 F350 manual transmission fit a 1984 F350 with an automatic?

Bill avatar
Bill:

Yes, you can use a transfer case from a 1981 F350 with a manual transmission in your 1984 F350 with an automatic transmission, but there are a few key considerations:

Compatibility Factors

  1. Transfer Case Type:

    • The NP205 is common for that era and is robust. Ensure it matches your application needs.
  2. Input Spline Count:

    • Check the spline count on the transfer case input shaft. It must match the output shaft of your transmission. Manual and automatic transmissions often have different spline counts.
  3. Adapter and Mounting:

    • You’ll need an adapter plate if the bolt pattern or input shaft length differs.
    • Ensure the mounting points align with your frame and crossmember.
  4. Linkage and Controls:

    • You may need different linkages or modifications to your existing setup for proper engagement.
  5. Driveshafts:

    • Driveshaft lengths may need adjusting due to transfer case differences.

Additional Tips

  • Inspect the Transfer Case: Ensure it’s in good condition with no leaks or excessive wear.
  • Consider Rebuilding: If the case is old or has unknown history, a rebuild kit might be a good investment.
  • Consult a Manual: Factory service manuals can provide specific details on differences and installation tips.

This swap is feasible with attention to detail in these areas. If you need more guidance, feel free to ask!

User avatar
View Table of Contents
User:

For a 1984 F350 swap, which manual transmission is preferable: T-18 or NP435?

Bill avatar
Bill:

The choice between the T18 and NP435 depends on your specific needs. Here’s a breakdown:

T18 Transmission

  • Gearing: Has a 6.32:1 first gear, which is excellent for low-speed torque and off-roading.
  • Durability: Known for being robust and reliable.
  • Availability: Fairly common and parts are generally available.

NP435 Transmission

  • Gearing: Offers a 6.68:1 first gear, slightly lower than the T18, providing even more grunt off the line.
  • Durability: Also very tough and reliable.
  • Shifting: Some find the NP435 smoother in operation.

Key Considerations

  • Usage: If you plan heavy off-roading or towing, the NP435’s lower first gear can be an advantage.
  • Parts: Both have good aftermarket support, but availability might vary by region.

Pro Tips

  • Check Compatibility: Ensure bellhousing and clutch components match your engine.
  • Inspect Thoroughly: Look for wear on gears and synchros in used units.
  • Rebuild Kits: Consider investing in a rebuild to ensure longevity.

Both are excellent choices, so it comes down to personal preference and specific needs. If you need more details, feel free to ask!

User avatar
View Table of Contents
User:

Which Dana 60 axle model years are compatible with a 1981 F350?

Bill avatar
Bill:

For a 1981 F350, you’ll want a Dana 60 front axle from the following years for the best fit:

Compatible Years

  1. 1978–1979 F-Series: These fit well with minimal modification.
  2. 1980–1991 F-Series: Direct bolt-in options exist, especially with F350 models.

Key Considerations

  • Spring Perches: Ensure they match your frame’s spacing.
  • Brake Components: Check for compatibility or consider upgrading to match your system.
  • Steering Linkage: Ensure it works with your existing steering setup.

Pro Tips

  • Inspect for Wear: Check kingpins, seals, and bearings before purchase.
  • Gear Ratio Match: Ensure the axle’s gear ratio matches your rear axle to avoid issues.
  • Aftermarket Support: Plenty of parts are available to rebuild or upgrade a Dana 60.

Choosing the right year and ensuring compatibility will make the swap smoother. If you have more questions, feel free to ask!

User avatar
View Table of Contents
User:

Which years of Dana 60 front axle fit a 1983 F350?

Bill avatar
Bill:

For a 1983 F350, the following years of Dana 60 front axles are compatible:

Compatible Years

  1. 1978–1979 F-Series: These can fit with some modifications.
  2. 1980–1991 F-Series: Direct bolt-in options, especially from F350 models.

Key Considerations

  • Spring Perches: Ensure they align with your frame’s spacing.
  • Brake Compatibility: Verify or upgrade to match your system.
  • Steering Components: Ensure linkage compatibility with your current setup.

Pro Tips

  • Inspect Before Purchase: Check for wear on kingpins, seals, and bearings.
  • Gear Ratio: Match the front axle’s gear ratio with your rear axle to avoid drivetrain issues.
  • Rebuild Options: Consider rebuilding for reliability, with lots of parts available.

Picking the right axle and ensuring compatibility will make your swap smoother. If you have more questions, feel free to ask!

User avatar
View Table of Contents
User:

What 4WD front axle pairs best with a 1983 F350 Dana 70HD rear axle with 3.54 gears?

Bill avatar
Bill:

To pair with a 1983 F350’s Dana 70HD rear axle with a 3.54 gear ratio, you’ll want a front axle that matches to ensure proper drivetrain operation. Here’s what you should consider:

Recommended Front Axle

  • Dana 60 Front Axle: This is a common and robust choice for an F350.

Key Steps

  1. Gear Ratio: Ensure the front axle also has a 3.54 gear ratio to match the rear.
  2. Compatibility: Look for axles from 1980–1991 F-Series trucks for a direct fit.
  3. Spring Perches and Brackets: Make sure they align with your frame setup.

Additional Considerations

  • Brake System: Check for compatibility or upgrade to match your truck.
  • Steering Linkage: Ensure it works with your current steering setup.
  • Condition: Inspect for wear on kingpins, seals, and bearings before purchasing.

Matching the gear ratios and ensuring fitment will lead to a smooth and reliable conversion. If you need more details, feel free to ask!

User avatar
View Table of Contents
User:

Are these components compatible: Dana 70HD rear axle (3.54), Dana 60 4WD front (3.54), BorgWarner 1345 transfer case, and a T-18 manual?

Bill avatar
Bill:

Your setup looks solid with a few key points to check for compatibility:

Compatibility Overview

  1. Dana 70HD Rear Axle (3.54 Ratio)

    • Matches well with the Dana 60 front axle when both have a 3.54 gear ratio.
  2. Dana 60 Front Axle (3.54 Ratio)

    • Ensure it has the proper spring perches and steering linkage for your frame.
  3. Borg Warner 1345 Transfer Case

    • Works with the T-18 transmission, but ensure you have the correct adapter for the transmission-to-transfer case interface.
    • Confirm the spline count matches the output shaft of the T-18.
  4. T-18 Manual Transmission

    • Known for its durability and works with the BW1345, assuming proper adapters are used.

Key Considerations

  • Driveshafts: May need modifications for length and yoke compatibility.
  • Linkages and Mounts: Ensure proper installation and alignment.
  • Crossmember: Check if the transfer case requires a different crossmember for mounting.

Pro Tips

  • Inspect Components: Check for wear and consider refreshing seals and bearings.
  • Check Ratios: Double-check both axles have matching gear ratios for smooth operation.
  • Installation Manuals: Reference factory manuals for detailed installation guidance.

Your combination should work well with careful attention to these details. Let me know if you have more questions!

User avatar
View Table of Contents
User:

Is a 1983 Ford C6 three-speed automatic compatible with an NP205 transfer case?

Bill avatar
Bill:

Yes, the 1983 C6 three-speed automatic transmission can be compatible with an NP205 transfer case, but you need to ensure a few things:

Compatibility Considerations

  1. Adapter Kit:

    • You’ll need an adapter to connect the C6 to the NP205. These are available in the aftermarket.
  2. Spline Count:

    • Ensure the spline count on the C6 output shaft matches the NP205 input. Common setups might need a 31-spline adapter.
  3. Crossmember and Mounts:

    • Adjust or modify the crossmember and mounts to accommodate the new setup.
  4. Linkage and Shifters:

    • You may need new linkage or modifications for the transfer case shifter.

Additional Tips

  • Inspect the Transfer Case: Before installation, check for wear and leaks. Consider a rebuild if condition is unknown.
  • Driveshaft Modifications: Length and yokes may need adjustment for proper fitment.
  • Transmission Cooler: Since the C6 is an automatic, ensure you have an adequate cooler for reliability.

These steps will help ensure a smooth installation and reliable performance. If you have more questions, feel free to ask!

User avatar
View Table of Contents
User:

For a 1983 F350 with a C6 automatic, is it easier to keep the C6 and add an NP205 or swap to a T-18 and BorgWarner 1345?

Bill avatar
Bill:

Converting your 1983 F350 from 2WD to 4WD can be done with either setup, but each has its pros and cons. Here’s a comparison to help you decide:

Keeping the C6 with NP205

Pros:

  • No Transmission Swap: Retaining the C6 means fewer components to change.
  • Simplicity: Automatics can be easier for daily driving and towing.
  • Cost: Potentially less expensive if the C6 is in good condition and you only need the adapter for the NP205.

Cons:

  • Adapters Needed: You’ll require an adapter to mate the C6 to the NP205.
  • Complexity: Setting up the linkage and mounts might require customization.

Switching to T-18 with BW1345

Pros:

  • Manual Control: Better for off-road use, with more direct control over gear selection.
  • Durability: Both the T-18 and BW1345 are known for being robust.

Cons:

  • Pedal Assembly: You’ll need to add a clutch pedal and associated components.
  • More Work: Swapping transmissions involves more labor and components.
  • Cost: Likely higher due to additional parts and complexity.

Key Considerations

  • Driving Preference: Consider if you prefer automatic or manual driving.
  • Current Transmission Condition: If the C6 is already in excellent condition, it might make sense to keep it.
  • Budget and Time: Factor in cost and how much time you can invest.

Pro Tips

  • Parts Availability: Check for availability of parts and rebuild kits for either choice.
  • Community Feedback: Engaging with forums like the Bullnose Ford subreddit can offer insights from those who’ve done similar projects.

Ultimately, the choice depends on your driving style and project goals. If you want more details, feel free to ask!



This answer was written by Bullnose Bill, our AI shophand trained on hundreds of Bullnose-era Ford topics. He knows his way around old Ford Trucks.

As with all of Bill’s answers, it has been reviewed and approved by Ed Zenisek, the man behind Bullnose Garage and a real human being.

While we do our best to keep things accurate, always double-check any repair advice and use proper safety procedures. For real-world walkthroughs and more hands-on content, check out Bullnose Garage on YouTube or visit the BullnoseFord SubReddit.


As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you see an Amazon link on my site, purchasing the item from Amazon using that link helps out the Channel.

Published on September 1, 2025

Click to play the video inline
 or 
see it on YouTube

Part of the The Bullnose Bronco series.

Part of the Ford Truck Systems and Parts series.

Want to see more like this? Subscribe to Bullnose Garage!

Show Transcript
If you ignore the fact that one of these is an F-150 and the other is a Bronco, then these two trucks are almost identical. They both run the trusty 300 inline 6. They both have an NP435 four-speed transmission. And of course, they both wear that classic bullnose style. But other than the model and the paint color, there is one pretty big difference. The Bronco has four-wheel drive. Howdy, folks. Ed here. Welcome back to Bullnose Garage. Four-wheel drive is one of those topics that can divide truck guys. Some folks will tell you that a truck without 4×4 is just a car with a bed. Others have never even needed it, let alone actually put a truck in four-wheel drive. But here’s the thing. Even if you’re in the first camp, the guys who swear by 4×4, do you actually know how the system works in an 80s era Ford? Ask any Ford guy what transfer case he’s running and you’ll either get a blank stare or a half-hour lecture. So today I’m going to save you the trouble of both. We’ll look at how the 4×4 system works in bullnose trucks, what transfer cases Ford used, how they differ, and how it all ties together with the hubs, the axles, and that floor shifter down by your right leg. And just to make it interesting, we’ll use my ’82 Bronco here as the guinea pig. It’s running a Borg Warner 1345 hooked up to an NP435 transmission. Even though the door tag says it should have been a T18. So somewhere along the way, this thing got a little surgery. You know, that’s half the fun of these old Fords. You never quite know what you got until you actually crawl under there and check it out. So, let’s check it out.

So, before we dig into transfer cases and all the details, let’s zoom out and look at the big picture of how four-wheel drive actually works on these bullnose trucks. Because it’s not just one part, it’s a whole system working together. In two-wheel drive, power runs from the engine into the transmission, through the output shaft, into the drive shaft, and straight back to the rear axle. Simple enough. You’re just pushing the truck with the back wheels. But when you add four-wheel drive into the mix, the transfer case gets involved. That’s the box hanging off the back of the transmission, and its whole job is to split the power. One output goes to the rear drive shaft like normal, and the other output sends power forward to the front drive shaft. The catch with these older trucks is that the front wheels aren’t always connected. And so, let me introduce you whippersnappers out there to the old school manual locking hubs. This means if you shift the transfer case into four high or four low, but don’t lock the hubs, well, the front drive shaft will spin, the differential will spin, and even the axle shafts inside the knuckles will spin. But the wheels themselves are just freewheeling. You’re not actually putting the front tires in 4×4 until those hubs are locked. Funny enough, you could technically just lock one hub and not the other. And this means that the rear axle is pushing and one front wheel is pulling and you’ve basically invented three-wheel drive. It’s not smart, but it is possible. And I guarantee a few people watching have probably done that. And because I know some keyboard warrior out there is going to call me out. Technically with open diffs, you only ever drive one tire per axle at a time, but you get the idea. The whole open versus lock diff thing is a rabbit hole of its own. Two-wheel drive, four-wheel drive, one-wheel peel, py lockers, but that’s a topic for another day. Anyway, so let’s talk transfer cases. This is the heart of the whole 4×4 system, and it’s what makes the magic happen. Ford gave us a few different options of the bullnose years depending on the truck and the year. The most common one you’re going to find is the Borg Warner 1345. That’s what’s in mine. It’s aluminum chain driven and it was the bread and butter of the F-150s and Broncos in the early to mid-80s. Lighter than the old cast iron monsters, but still tough enough for what most guys use these trucks for. It weighs about 85 to 90 lbs dry, handles enough torque for both those applications, and uses a 2.72 to 1 low range with a chain about an inch and a quarter wide. It’s plenty stout for a small block or a six-cylinder, but if you throw a big block or crazy torque at it, that chain, it’s eventually going to stretch. Another one that you’ll run into is a new process 208 aluminum case, also chain driven, and just a bit lighter duty than the Borg Warner, about 80 pounds with 2.61 to 1 low range. A lot of F-150s and Broncos had them and while they get the job done, the housing was just a little bit weaker. You drop one on a rock and you’ll find out real quick why a lot of guys like to swap them out. Now we go to the NP 205. It is the Brute. All cast iron gear driven, tip of the scales at about 140 lbs dry. It’s got a shallow 6 to 1 low range, but what it lacks in gear reduction it makes up for in sheer indestructibility. By the bullnose years, you weren’t likely to see one of those in a half-ton or a Bronco because they mostly lived in the F250s and 350s or they got swapped in later by guys who wanted bulletproof strength. These things will take a thousand ft-lbs of torque without even blinking, which is why rock crawlers and heavy haulers still hunt them down today. And finally, at the very beginning of the Bricknose era in 1987, you had the Borg Warner 1356, just a touch heavier than its brother with 2.69 to 1 low range. Think of it as the 1345’s bigger brother. Still chain driven, but beefed up for the next generation. And I’m mentioning here because even though it’s not a bullnose transfer case, it’s a potential swap in. So, quick note here on the difference between a chain driven case and a gear driven case. Gear-driven cases like the NP 205 are heavier, they’re noisy, and they’re pretty much indestructible because it’s just gears meshing together. Chain-driven cases like the 1345 or 208 are lighter, quieter.

The chain is always the weak link. You could stretch it, skip it, break it, and if you do, you’re dead in the water. It’s a classic trade-off: strength, weight, and durability versus refinement, manners, and everyday drivability. My ’82 Bronco has the Borg Warner 1345 transfer case. Down here on the floor, you have the shifter with four positions: two high, four high, neutral, and four low. In two high, you’re sending power straight back to the rear wheels. Shift into four high, and the front drive shaft gets engaged, putting you in four-wheel drive at a 1:1 ratio. Neutral disconnects everything, useful for flat towing or certain recovery situations. Ford included neutral as a true towing mode, with an internal pump that keeps things lubricated even when flat towed behind an RV. Four low is where things get serious, with a 2.72:1 reduction applied to both the front and rear drive shafts, increasing torque for crawling through tough terrain. My Bronco runs this 1345 behind an NP 435 four-speed, even though the door tag says it should have been a T18. Someone swapped it, but it doesn’t change how the transfer case works. With the NP 435’s ultra-low granny first gear, if I put the transmission in first and the transfer case in four low, the reduction multiplies to about an 18:1 overall reduction before hitting the axles. With my gears and 31-inch tires, that’s over a 60:1 final drive at the wheels. Translation: I can just about pull a freight train at 1 mph. Obviously, that doesn’t mean my Bronco could actually tow a freight train. The gearing gives control and torque multiplication, but the driveline parts are only so strong. Low range is built for crawling through tough terrain or easing a heavy trailer into place, not dragging half the Santa Fe railroad behind you. It’s a good way to understand the mechanical advantage these old Fords can give you. One thing I love about these old trucks is how simple the shifters are. No buttons, no electronics, just a lever on the floor. In my Bronco, this shifter goes straight into the Borg Warner 1345. It’s a mechanical linkage, so when I pull it, it physically moves the gears inside the transfer case. The pattern is simple: two high, four high, neutral, and four low. You feel it clunk into each position, and you know exactly where you’re at. It’s not the smoothest thing; sometimes you have to roll the truck a bit to get it to drop in, but that’s part of the character. It’s raw and mechanical, and you’re connected directly to what’s happening underneath. These old Borg Warner cases weren’t true shift-on-the-fly setups like newer trucks. The manual says you can slip it into four high while rolling real slow, maybe under 5 mph, but it can be rough. Four low is full stop only. Yank while moving, and you’ll quickly find out why replacement parts are hard to come by. Treat it like the old 40-year-old mechanical box that it is. Smooth, deliberate shifts will serve you well. Fast forward three decades, and my 2015 F-150 has a neat little knob on the dash and a digital readout that tells me I’m in four-wheel drive. It even shows how much power is going to each wheel. It’s super convenient, but it lacks the character and charm of that old-school floor shifter. With the old trucks, you feel the clunk, hear the gears, and know something mechanical just happened. It’s a whole different feeling. Let’s move up front because the transfer case is only half the story. This Bronco, like most bullnose F-150s and Broncos, is running a Dana 44 twin traction beam front axle. That’s Ford’s unique take on independent front suspension, with two beams that pivot in the middle and a differential offset to one side. Some people love it, some hate it, but it was Ford’s way of trying to give a smoother ride without going full independent. On the ends, you have the locking hubs. These are manual hubs, meaning if you want four-wheel drive, you have to hop out, grab the dial, and twist it from free to lock. That physically connects the wheel to the axle shaft. When the front drive shaft spins, the wheels spin with it. Leave it on free, and the front wheels just coast while everything else spins inside. Ford also offered automatic locking hubs starting in the early ’80s, especially with select shift automatics. They became more common by around ’83 or ’84 when automatics became more popular, especially on higher trim Broncos and F-150s. By ’85 and ’86, they were fairly common, though manuals were still available, and many trucks stuck with them. Mechanically, the difference is simple. Manual hubs are driver-controlled. You turn the dial on the hub, and that physically locks the wheel hub to the axle shaft with a set of splines and a clutch ring.

Once it’s locked, you’re connected. Period. Automatic hubs, on the other hand, use a cam spring setup inside the hub. When the axle shaft starts turning under power, the cam engages the clutch and locks the wheel to the shaft automatically. That sounds great, but the problem is that they rely on friction and movement to engage. If the system’s worn out or you’re in a tricky spot, sometimes they’ll flip, half engage, or not engage at all. That’s why a lot of guys today either swap back to manuals or wish they had. Manuals are dead simple. You lock them and you know you’re good. Since we’re talking about the Dana 44 twin traction beam, here’s a fun tidbit. Ford kept this design alive all the way into the ’90s. Some folks even argue that the basic concept is still alive in a lot of trucks today. A lot of people bash on it compared to a solid front axle, but the twin traction beam did what Ford wanted. It rode nicer on the highway, still gave you four-wheel drive off-road, and it’s become a hallmark of Ford trucks from that era. Love it or hate it, it is pure bullnose DNA. If you’re interested, I have a great video specifically about the twin I beam and twin traction beam setup on these trucks. Definitely go check that video out because it dives into all that information. Let’s tie it all together and actually go through the process of engaging four-wheel drive on this Bronco. First, I got the truck sitting in two-wheel drive. That means the transfer case is in two high, sending power straight back to the rear axle, and the hubs are set to free. In this state, the front drive shaft and the axle can spin around, but the wheels aren’t connected. Basically, just a rear-wheel drive truck. Now, let’s say I want four-wheel drive. Step one is to lock the hubs. Walk up to each front wheel, twist the dial from free to lock. Now those wheels are physically connected to the axle shaft. Step two is to hop back in the cab and move the transfer case shifter from two high into four high. At that point, the case engages the front drive shaft. Because the hubs are locked, the front wheels now get power. Congratulations. You’re officially in 4×4. You might be wondering what happens if you lock the hubs but leave the transfer case in two high. In that case, the front wheels spin the axle shafts, which spin the differential, which spins the front drive shaft, which spins the front gears inside the transfer case, but none of that’s actually engaged to the engine. All you’re really doing is turning a bunch of extra iron for no real reason. You’re adding wear, you’re adding drag, and you’re getting reduced fuel economy. On a bonus Ford, reduced fuel economy usually just means a little more terrible. Once you’re in 4×4, a couple things change in how the truck behaves. There’s no center differential in these part-time systems. That means the front and rear axles are locked together at the transfer case, spinning at the same speed. It’s great for traction in mud, snow, or dirt, but if you try to run on dry pavement, you’ll feel it bind up in the turns. That’s called driveline bind, and it’s why you should only use 4×4 on loose or slippery surfaces. Another thing to keep in mind, tire size and pressure matter. If your front and rear tires are mismatched even slightly, the transfer case is going to feel that difference and start fighting itself. If you push it hard enough, something’s going to give, usually a U-joint or a chain. Now that we’ve covered the basics of how it all works, let’s talk about some of the quirks, common issues, and things you want to stay on top of if you’re keeping one of these old Ford trucks on the road. First up, chain stretch. The Borg Warner 1345 and 1356 both use a chain to drive the front output, as does the NP208. Over time, that chain can stretch, especially if the truck’s been used hard in four low. You’ll know it’s happening when you start hearing a rattling or popping sound under load, almost like the chain is skipping teeth. If you ignore it, you’ll eventually be sitting in the mud with a whole lot of noise and no forward motion. Then there’s the case on the NP208. Easy transfer case for what it was, but the housing could be a weak point. They were pretty lightweight, but one smack on a rock or over-torque the mounting bolts and you could end up with a crack. Once that happens, you’re not fixing it with JB Weld. You’re just hunting for another case. Shift linkages are another wear item. After 40 years, the bushings get sloppy and you’ll feel it when the shifter doesn’t want to fully drop into gear or feels a little bit vague. Sometimes guys think the whole transfer case is shot, but really it’s just a linkage that needs a refresh. Don’t forget about seals. These cases can leak, and output shaft seals get tired. If you don’t keep an eye on them, you can run low on fluid. Speaking of fluid, here’s a critical one. The Borg Warner and new process chain-driven cases use ATF, automatic transmission fluid, not gear oil. The gear oil can ruin the internals. The NP205 is the exception. It’s gear-driven and it takes gear oil. Knowing what belongs in your case is step one. Regular fluid changes are cheap insurance. Ford called for around every 30,000 miles, but let’s be real, most of these trucks went decades without one. If you buy a bullnose and don’t know its history, draining and refilling the transfer case should probably be one of the first jobs on your list. On the axle side, keep an eye on the U-joints. If you hear clicking when turning in 4×4, that’s your sign they’re worn out. They’re cheap and easy to replace, but ignore them and you risk a failure that could take out a yoke or drive shaft. As for upgrades, there are a few no-brainers. If you have automatic hubs, swap back to manual.

Manuals, upgrade. That alone can save you some headaches. If you’re doing a Borg Warner 1345 or 1356 behind something making serious torque, you need to consider an upgraded heavy-duty chain. And if you’re building a hardcore off-roader, the NP 205 is still the king. Heavier, shallower, low range, but about as close to unbreakable as it gets. One last fun bit of trivia: some guys lock the hubs while driving in too high, especially in winter or muddy conditions, to avoid getting out of the cab to lock the wheels every time they get stuck. It adds a little drag, wear, and maybe knocks half a mile per gallon off fuel economy, but on a bullnose Ford getting 12 mpg anyway, who’s counting? That’s the rundown on how Ford’s four-wheel drive system worked back in the bullnose years. From the transfer cases, whether it’s the Borg Warner 1345 like mine, the NP 208, or the legendary NP 205, to the floor shifters, the hubs, and the D44 twin traction beam up front. It all comes together to give these trucks their character. Modern trucks have knobs on the dash, digital readouts, and fancy electronics do the thinking for you. Convenient, sure, but there’s something satisfying about pulling a lever, feeling it chunk into gear, and knowing those front wheels are locked in because you made it happen. Four-wheel drive isn’t just about getting unstuck. It’s about understanding how all the parts work together and respecting what these old trucks were built to do. They may not be the most efficient or the smoothest, but they’ve got a kind of honesty and mechanical charm you just don’t get anymore. That’s why I love working with them. For me, that’s what makes this ’82 Bronco and that F-150 special. It’s not just another truck. It’s a reminder of how Ford built 4x4s tough, simple, and ready for anything. Love them or hate them, bullnose Fords have their own DNA, and it’s alive every time you roll out of the driveway in two-wheel or four-wheel drive. So, there you have it. Everything I know or pretend to know about bullnose Ford 4×4 systems and transfer cases. If you have any questions, concerns, gripes, or got something wrong, drop it in the comments and let me know. As always, thanks so much for watching, and we will see you next time. She’s rough around the edges, but she’s doing fine. Tinker Moon’s garage. She’s considered divine. Thanks again for watching. We will see you next time.

Welcome to the World of Bullnose 4×4

Hey folks, Ed here from Bullnose Garage. Today, we’re diving deep into the four-wheel drive systems of the 1980s Ford trucks—specifically, the transfer cases that make these systems tick. If you’ve ever wondered how these classic machines manage to pull themselves through mud, snow, or whatever else you throw at them, you’re in the right place. So, grab a coffee, or a wrench if you’re feeling ambitious, and let’s get into it.

How 4×4 Works on Bullnose Fords

First things first, let’s zoom out and look at the big picture. In two-wheel drive, power runs from the engine into the transmission, through the output shaft, into the drive shaft, and straight back to the rear axle. Simple, right? But when you engage four-wheel drive, the transfer case gets involved. This little box splits power between the front and rear drive shafts. The catch is that the front wheels aren’t always connected, thanks to those old-school manual locking hubs. Shift into four high or four low without locking the hubs, and you’re just spinning parts without actually being in 4×4. Funny enough, you can lock one hub and not the other, effectively inventing three-wheel drive. Not smart, but possible.

The Transfer Case Trio: BW1345, NP208, NP205

Now, let’s talk about the heart of the 4×4 system—the transfer cases. The most common one you’ll find in bullnose trucks is the Borg Warner 1345. It’s an aluminum, chain-driven case weighing about 85 to 90 lbs, with a 2.72:1 low range. It’s tough enough for most applications but can stretch under heavy torque. Next up, the NP208, another aluminum chain-driven case, slightly lighter duty at 80 lbs with a 2.61:1 low range. It’s a bit weaker, and dropping one on a rock will teach you why many folks swap them out. Finally, the NP205, the brute of the bunch. It’s a cast iron, gear-driven monster weighing in at 140 lbs, with a shallow 1.96:1 low range. It’s indestructible, making it a favorite among rock crawlers and heavy haulers.

Shifter Positions and Crawl Ratios

In my ’82 Bronco, the Borg Warner 1345 transfer case offers four positions: two high, four high, neutral, and four low. In two high, power goes straight to the rear wheels. In four high, the front drive shaft engages for a 1:1 ratio. Neutral is useful for flat towing, while four low gives you a 2.72:1 reduction for serious torque. With the NP435’s granny first gear, the reduction multiplies to about 18:1, offering over a 60:1 final drive at the wheels. Translation: you can pull a freight train at 1 mph, theoretically speaking.

Manual vs Automatic Hubs

Moving up front, let’s talk hubs. My Bronco uses manual locking hubs, meaning you have to hop out and twist the dial from free to lock. Automatic hubs, on the other hand, engage when the axle shaft starts turning under power. Sounds great, but they can be unreliable, leading many to swap back to manuals. Manuals are simple and reliable—lock them, and you’re good to go.

Common Issues and Maintenance Tips

These old systems come with their quirks. Chain stretch is a common issue in chain-driven cases, leading to rattling or popping sounds under load. The NP208’s housing can be a weak point, and shift linkages can wear out, making gear shifts vague. Regular fluid changes are crucial—use ATF for chain-driven cases and gear oil for the NP205. And don’t forget to keep an eye on those U-joints.

Upgrades and Real-World Quirks

If you’re looking to upgrade, swapping automatic hubs for manuals is a no-brainer. For serious torque, consider a heavy-duty chain for the Borg Warner 1345 or 1356. And if you’re building a hardcore off-roader, the NP205 is still king. A fun trick some folks use is locking the hubs while in two high for quick 4×4 engagement, though it adds a bit of drag.

Why Bullnose 4×4 Still Matters

Modern trucks might have fancy electronics and dashboard knobs, but there’s something satisfying about pulling a lever and feeling those gears engage. These old Fords might not be the most efficient, but they’ve got a mechanical charm that’s hard to beat. They’re a reminder of a time when trucks were built tough and simple, ready for anything.

So, there you have it—everything you need to know about the 4×4 systems in bullnose Fords. If you have questions or want to share your own experiences, drop a comment below. Thanks for hanging out with me in the garage, and I’ll see you next time.


Bullnose Garage at YouTube

If you want more specific information on Bullnose Ford Trucks, check out my YouTube Channel!

For more information on Bullnose Fords, you can check out the BullnoseFord SubReddit or Gary’s Garagemahal. Both are excellent resources.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you see an Amazon link on my site, purchasing the item from Amazon using that link helps out the Channel.